thepeopletoheiationalaffairs.hesaidi:”noo

appliedinplaceofpersonalpreferendions.

hereoste,butwehavea

securetheelvesforlife.noliketobehyandtoliveinpeace

fight.theyhertheygoforuback.thatisdangerousfor

”publiitizen”aoatfeneralapathyandindifferenceof

theyouasktheoforsaketheiroilitaryservice,

applytoboththerulerandtheruledalike.”hebelievedthatthelawshouldbe

itisstilltruetodaythatanyprivate

individualsandthereasonistobefoundinthela.istoodangerous

notionotallyunese.

anyprivateindividuals,”

onesshallstandequal.”hepushedtheideaofaisticruleofthelahat

theyerid

iedinbuildingtheirorytoavoidwar.byavoidingwar,

punishntandreble.”hase

legalistighty,and

heinhissystehat”thekingshoulddonothing.”theking

subtaedfrobr>

ntrasttothenfuistdictuhat”urtesyshouldehe

statutesthatshouldbeappliedrigidly,sothathelahecleverwill

reinpoor.noobeindangerandpovertynaturally,theyryto

thereportantpassagein

averagerunofkin

keepayou.thereforetheyindtheirownbusinessandwillbe

supre,thatallpeopleshouldbeequalbeforethelahatthislawshouldbe

andanyattention.ofurse,they

...

foraoopublicspirited,itisnaturalthatheshouldtakeanapathetic

本章已阅读完毕(请击下一章继续阅读!)

theseselvesknow.

attitudetoentfreedyand

rruptoffiuannaturethattheyshouldnotberrupt.

typeofthinkingthatstrikesasbeingstunghiisstra,in

nceivedofalahehighandthelohecleveronesaupid

ntsratherthanthefulfilntofthelarue

shoulddonothing,becausehesahekingsuldnotdoanythinganyhe

andhofroeekingpeadhthisisthereason

nersandpunishntshouldnotbeserveduptothelords9wehaveherea

henfeitsebelievediablishntofan”inviolablelahshould

hebelievediteistic